Shatrunjay Tripathi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3022 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Shatrunjay Tripathi Son Of Shri Ram Naresh Tripathi Resident Of Village & Post - Ameya, P.S. - Kateya, District - Gopalganj .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Human Resource Development Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna
3. The Director, Primary Education, Government Of Bihar, Patna
4. The Deputy Director, Primary Education, Government Of Bihar, Patna
5. The District Education Officer, Gopalganj
6. The District Program Officer (Establishment), Gopalganj
7. The Recruitment Unit Of Block Manjha, Through, The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Manjha, District - Gopalganj
8. The Block Development Officer, Manjha, District - Gopalganj
9. The Recuritment Unit Of Block Kuchaikote, Through The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer Kuchaikote, District - Gopalganj
10. The Block Development Officer, Kuchaikote, District - Gopalganj
11. The Requirement Unit Of Block Kateya, Through The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Kateya, District - Gopalganj
12. The Block Development Officer, Kateya, District - Gopalganj
13. The Recruitment Unit Of Block Panchdeori, Through The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Panchdeori, District - Gopalganj
14. The Block Development Officer, Panchdeori, District - Gopalganj
15. The Recuritment Unit Of Block Gopalganj, Through The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj
16. The Block Development Officer, Gopalganj, District Gopalganj
17. The Recuritment Unit Of Block Hathua, Through The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Hathua, District - Gopalganj
18. The Block Development Officer, Hathua, District - Gopalganj
19. The Recuritment Unit Of Block Phulwaria, Through The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Phulwaria, District - Gopalganj
20. The Block Development Officer, Phulwaria, District - Gopalganj
21. The Recuritment Unit Of Block Bhorey, Through The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Bhorey, District - Gopalganj
22. The Block Development Officer, Bhorey, District - Gopalganj
23. The Recuritment Unit Of Block Thawe, Through The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Thawe, District - Gopalganj
24. The Block Development Officer, Thawe, District - Gopalganj
25. The Recruitment Unit Of Block Barauli, Through The Executive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Barauli, District - Gopalganj
26. The Block Development Officer, Barauli, District - Gopalganj
27. The Recruitment Unit Of Block Uchakagaon, Through The Exeuctive Officer Cum The Block Development Officer, Uchakagaon, District - Gopalganj
Patna High Court CWJC No.3022 of 2013 (3) dt.12-01-2016
28. The Block Development Officer, Uchakagaon, District - Gopalganj
29. The Recuritment Unit Of Nagar Parishad Gopalganj, Through The Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Gopalganj
30. The Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Parishad, Gopalganj
31. The Recruitment Unit Of Nagar Panchayat, Kateya, Through The Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Kateya, District - Gopalganj
32. The Executive Officer Nagar Panchayat, Kateya, District - Gopalganj
33. The Recuritment Unit Of Nagar Panchayat, Mirganj, Through The Executive Officer Nagar Panchayat Mirganj, District - Gopalganj
34. The Executive Officer Nagar Panchayat, Mirganj, District - Gopalganj
35. The Recuritment Unit Of Nagar Panchayat , Barauli, Through The Executive Officer Nagar Panchayat Barauli, District - Gopalganj
36. The Executive Officer Nagar Panchayat, Barauli, District - Gopalganj .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey No-5 For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kr. Ambastha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 12-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has applied for appointment of Panchayat Teacher, 2012 in third phase. In terms of the notification preference was to be given to the trained teachers. In absence of trained teachers, untrained teacher was to be taken into consideration for appointment as Panchayat Teacher. Though up to the last date of filing of the application the petitioner had not obtained training certificate but he has appeared in the final examination of training and awaiting its result. Altogether two years was taken for completion of selection process and
Patna High Court CWJC No.3022 of 2013 (3) dt.12-01-2016 by that time he has obtained training certificate and as such his case should be considered for appointment. From the fact emerges admittedly the petitioner up to the last date of filing of application was not holding any training certificate. Any certificate obtained by the petitioner subsequently will not give any preferential right to be considered for appointment in the category of trained teacher. This Court does not find any merit in this writ petition. Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U