Dilkhush Jarra @ Gulam Rabbani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57220 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2023 Thana- DAGARUA District- Purnia ====================================================== Dilkhush Jarra @ Gulam Rabbani Son Of Abedeen Jarra Resident Of VillagePatringa, Ward No. 2, Ps- Dagarua, Distt- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bijendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 6 of POCSO Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he ravished the minor daughter of the informant.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that informant has borrowed Rs. 50,000/- from the petitioner and when the petitioner demanded his money back, informant roped him in the present case with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57220 of 2023(4) dt.04-12-2023 2/2 false and concocted story. Moreover, the petitioner is in judicial custody since 08.04.2023.

Learned APP appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposed the prayer of the petitioner and submitted that victim has specifically stated about the complicity of petitioner in commission of her rape, in her statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. She has stated that petitioner has committed rape with her and filled her mouth with sand. Medical report also corroborates with the prosecution case.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of allegation, this court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.

Learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as soon as possible.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Nirajkrs/- U T