Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61160 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-298 Year-2025 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== Sunny Kumar S/o Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav R/o Village- Baijnath Yadav, P.S.- Rajauli, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Kamaluddin, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 17-12-2025 Heard Mr. Md. Kamaluddin, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel for the informant beside the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Rajauji P.S. Case No. 298 of 2025 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 3(5) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 lodged on 08.06.2025 by the informant, Shivam Raj.

3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while he was returning after attending a wedding, the petitioner alongwith the others assaulted and upon protest, allegation is that this petitioner gave sharp blade blow causing injury to him. He was shifted to Sub-Divisional Hospital which followed the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61160 of 2025(4) dt.17-12-2025 2/2 there is case and counter case, both sides have suffered, the allegation against this petitioner is also there of outraging the modesty of the female inmate and in continuation of the cases that is/are lodged, the present one.

5. Learned counsel for the informant on the other hand opposes the prayer, has taken this Court to the learned Sessions Judge order to show that the injury that this petitioner inflicted on the injured has been found to be grievous in nature.

6. Considering the aforesaid fact as also that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent, it would be appropriate that the petitioner seek bail.

7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T