Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1690/2018rejected

Bachani Kuer @ Bechari Kuer v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-16Mr. Justice Arun Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1690 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2017 Thana -DURGAWATI District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Bachani Kuer @ Bechari Kuer W/o Late Bhushan Sah @ Brij Bhushan Sah, R/o Village- Durgawati, P.S.- Durgawati, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Gauri Shankar Gupta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-02-2018 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in Durgawati PS Case No. 129 of 2017 (NDPS Case No. 10 of 2017) registered under Sections 9, 20(b)(ii)(c), 25 and 27A of the NDPS Act. The allegation in brief is that the police apprehended three persons moving on a Duster vehicle, recovered 11.

5 Kg Ganja with some packets and they disclosed that Ganja has been delivered to Sanjay Dubey, Raj Kumar Gupta and Munna Sah, when police raided the house of Raj Kumar Gupta recovered 22 Kilo 950 grams of Ganja from one of the rooms of the his house wherein his wife and mother-in-law (the petitioner) were present. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that co-accused have stated about delivery of Ganja to Raj Kumar Gupta, the petitioner is female inmate of the house and Raj Kumar Gupta has been admitted to bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court. However, learned Counsel for the State submits that there is recovery of Ganja from the room where two ladies including the petitioner were found, the room was closed and this petitioner has also got one criminal antecedent of similar nature.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1690 of 2018 (3) dt.16-02-2018 Having considered the said facts and circumstances, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. The petitioner may renew prayer for bail after one year if the trial does not conclude by that period.

(Arun Kumar, J.) Snkumar/- U T