Patna High CourtCR. MISC./58604/2024dismissed

Md. Iklakh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-28Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58604 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2024 Thana- PUNAURA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Md. Iklakh S/o- Mohammad Ashik @ Md. Ashik Resident of VillageKushmari, P.S.- Riga, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-08-2024 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Punaura P.S. Case No. 108 of 2024 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, unknown criminals looted one motorcycle, mobile phone and cash of Rs. 7500/- from the informant.

4. Petitioner has given a self inculpatory statement and the motorcycle has been recovered on the basis of confessional statement of the petitioner from the house of coaccused Shivam Kumar @ Chhotu.

5. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that because of road rage, the occurrence took place

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58604 of 2024(2) dt.28-08-2024 2/2 and the motorcycle of the informant was taken away by the petitioner along with others so that the motorcycle of the informant gets repaired. Petitioner is in jail since 27.05.2024 and has clean antecedent as claimed by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

6. Learned A.P.P. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and has submitted that the looted motorcycle has been recovered from the co-accused on the statement of the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. This application for regular bail is, accordingly, rejected.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T