Arvind Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14434 of 2022 ====================================================== Arvind Kumar Singh Son of Shiv Nandan Singh, Resident at Road No. 18, Magadh Colony, Gaya, Bihar- 823001.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Collector/District Magistrate, District- Gaya. 3.

The Excise Commissioner, Magadh Range, District- Gaya. 4.

The Superintendent of Police District- Gaya.

5.

The Superintendent of Excise, District- Gaya. 6.

The S.H.O. of Amas Police Station, District- Gaya. 7.

The Inspector Excise Prohibition Quick Force, District- Gaya. 8.

The A.S.I. Abhiranjan Kumar of Amas Police Station, District- Gaya. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Vivek Prasad (G.P. 7) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice /Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also, the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences /offices.) Date : 14-10-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):-

2/4

3/4 Allegation is recovery of 750 ml. of illicit liquor from the seized motorcycle of the petitioner. Petitioner claims to be the owner of the said vehicle. It is further submitted that a meagre quantity of 750 ml. of liquor has been recovered from the vehicle, as such, it cannot be inferred that the vehicle was used for transporting/carrying illicit liquor, nor it can be presumed that recovered illicit liquor was kept for sale/purchase/ trade purpose and it appears that same was kept for personal consumption. In the facts and circumstances of the case, the District Magistrate/Confiscating Officer concerned is directed to provisionally release the vehicle of petitioner after due identification of ownership of the vehicle on production of ownership and registration papers with respect to vehicle in question in his/her name and on furnishing adequate sureties to the satisfaction of District Magistrate / Confiscating Authority and undertaking.

The release shall be allowed within a period of 14 days from the date of submission of the sureties and the undertakings as stated above, which would however be subject to finalization of the confiscation proceeding.

Petitioner is also at liberty to get his/her vehicle

4/4 released on payment of penalty in terms of Rule 12(A) inserted by amending Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021. With said observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) veena/rajivAFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date