Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56143/2025bail granted

Muni Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-21Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.74405 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2025 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Kaushalya Devi W/o Rajendra Chaudhary Resident of village - Rewda P.S.- Barachatti, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56143 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2025 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== Muni Devi D/O Leela Yadav @ Lila Yadav , W/O Late Ajay Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Godawari, Bhairavsthan, P.S.- Rampur, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 74405 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Satyaveer Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Syed Ehteshamuddin, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 56143 of 2025) For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashutosh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Rampur P.S. Case no.204 of 2025 registered under section 97 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74405 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 2/3 the petitioners is of kidnapping the 5 year old son of the informant who had gone for study to the Anganwari Centre.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case. No such occurrence as alleged has taken place. The son of the informant was recovered from the house of one Rupa Devi and the petitioner Kaushalya Devi has been falsely implicated in the case only for the reason that the said Rupa Devi is said to be the sister's daughter of Kaushalya Devi. The petitioners are in custody since 4.5.2025 and 1.5.2025 respectively and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegations in the FIR, the material that has transpired in course of investigation, the minor son of the informant having been recovered from the house of Rupa Devi, the petitioners being in custody for 8 months since 4.5.2025 and 1.5.2025 respectively and chargesheet having been submitted in the case, the Court directs both the petitioners to be enlarged on bail in connection with Rampur P.S. Case no.204 of 2025 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.74405 of 2025(3) dt.21-01-2026 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gaya.

(Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T