Karan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59005 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-299 Year-2024 Thana- BUXAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Karan Singh Son of Ranjit Singh R/O Vill- Dullahpur(Ahirauli), P.S.- Buxar(I), Distt- Buxar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of 8 cases but has been acquitted in 3 cases as such as of date five cases are pending against the petitioner. It is next submitted that in sum and substance the allegation against this petitioner is of assaulting the injured on head by brick. It is further submitted that on account of dispute relating to election the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case because of his antecedents. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59005 of 2024(2) dt.30-01-2025 2/3 admitting then the blow was not repeated and from perusal of the order impugned it would manifest that the injury appears to be simple as the order impugned does not record the nature of injury rather it has been recorded that- this court further finds that injury is on vital part of the body, therefore the nature of the injury would not lesson the liabilities of the accused. It is also asserted and submitted that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and the petitioner will not abscond rather will co-operate in the investigation to prove his innocence.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Buxar (T) P.S Case No.299/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. However, it is made clear that till the charge sheet

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59005 of 2024(2) dt.30-01-2025 3/3 is not filed, the petitioner will keep marking his attendance in the concerned police station on 15th of every month commencing from February, 2025.

7. It is further made clear that in the event if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner despite giving assurance to this court is not co-operating in the investigation, in that event, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T