Baliram Singh @ Baliram Mehta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42296 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -240 Year- 2013 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Baliram Singh @ Baliram Mehta Son of Permeshwar Mahto @ Parmeshwar Methta Resident of Village - Belounja, P.O. - Daranagar, P.S. - Nauhatta, Distt - Rohtas .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Bhagwan Kumar Singh Son of Raghunath Singh Resident of Village - Ranjitganj, P.S. - Rohtas, Distt - Rohtas
3. Madhu Devi Wife of Baliram Singh D/o - Raghunath Singh , Presently resident of Village - Ranjitganj, P.O. - Ramdihra, P.S. - Distt - Rohtas .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Om Prakash Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 25-06-2015 The petitioner figured as an accused in Complaint Case No.240 of 2013 filed by O.P. No.3 in which cognizance was taken under Sections-323, 341 and 498A of I.P.C.
Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner filed A.B.P. No.453 of 2014 in the court of learned Sessions Judge, Rohtas. The same was dismissed on 17.7.2014. Hence, this application for anticipatory bail under Section-438 of Cr.P.C.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42296 of 2014 (3) dt.25-06-2015 2/2 Whether one goes by the nature of allegations or the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the recent past, the arrest of a person who figured as accused in a case wherein offences punishable under Section-498A of I.P.C. is alleged, is not at all warranted. Having gone into the facts and circumstances of the case, application is allowed. In the event of arrest, let the petitioner named above be enlarged on anticipatory bail upon furnishing the bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) along with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Dehri in connection with Complaint Case No.240 of 2013, subject to the conditions laid down under Section-438(2) of Cr.P.C. (L. Narasimha Reddy,CJ) K.C.jha/- U T