← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56073/2025bail rejected

Ambuj Singh @ Jhunnu Singh @ Ambuj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-15Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56073 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-291 Year-2025 Thana- RAMNAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ambuj Singh @ Jhunnu Singh @ Ambuj Kumar son of Late Anirudh Singh Arun Village -Arjun Nagar, Ward No 3, P.s- Ramnagar, District -West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate Ms. Vaishnavi Singh, Advocate Mr. Ritwik Thakur, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-11-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2)(a) and 3(5) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that without the requisite qualification, this petitioner, along with other accused persons, started doing the delivery of wife of informant as a result of which, wife of informant died.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56073 of 2025(3) dt.15-11-2025 2/2 this case with ulterior motive.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he, along with other accused persons, started doing the delivery of wife of informant without even having any qualification due to which, wife of informant died. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation and gravity of offence, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T