Vinod Chandravanshi @ Binod Chandravanshi @ Vinod Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42826 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1 Year- 2015 Thana -HARIJAN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================
1. Vinod Chandravanshi @ Binod Chandravanshi @ Vinod Ram Son of Late Ram Sevak Chandravanshi, R/o Mohalla Barah Patharm, P.S. - Dehri - on - Sone, Rohtas, Bihar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avanish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-12-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 504, 56, 307, 302 and 34 of the I.P.C and sections 3 (i) (X) SC/ST Act.
Allegedly, the petitioner and other FIR named accused came in drunken condition and assaulted the husband of the informant causing injury to him and then he was brought to Narayan Medical College, Jamuhar from where he was referred to Patna and further abused taking the caste name, later on husband of the informant died.
Submission is of false implication and that during investigation it has come that Mithilesh Paswan after catching collar threw Sheo Mangal Paswan on the ground causing serious
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42826 of 2015 (3) dt.16-12-2015 2/2 injury on his head and he became unconscious, vide paragraph-39 of the case diary, which is the statement of son of the deceased and as such against the petitioner there is no specific allegation and he is suffering in custody since 20.03.2015, charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence.
The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail.
In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner, the allegation is omnibus and general in nature and as such the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M. Dehri-On-Sone, Rohtas in SC/ST Dehri P.S. Case No. 01 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T