Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46718/2017bail granted

Chhotu Kumar @ Chintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-09-22Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.46718 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -83 Year- 2015 Thana -SHEIKHOPUR SARAI District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Chhotu Kumar @ Chintu Kumar, son of Kamlesh Barma @ Kmlesh KUmar resident of Village- Sugia P.S. Sheikhopur Sarai District Sheikhpura .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Shekhopur Sarai P.S. Case No. 83 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395, 397 and 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is not named in the FIR and later on his name transpires in the confessional statement of co-accused. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has falsely been implicated in this case and he is in custody since 28.6.2017 and no material is available against the petitioner. Further submission is that though he is made accused in two other cases but he is on bail in those cases.

Heard learned APP also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46718 of 2017 (2) dt.22-09-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of facts and circumstances, let petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura, in connection with Shekhopur Sarai P.S. Case No. 83 of 2015, subject to the following conditions :- (1) One of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) Petitioner will mark his attendance before local police station in first week of every month till conclusion of trial, so that police may watch his conduct during pendency of trial, failing which his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U