← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./327/2014dismissed

Anju Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-09-23Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.327 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 10905 of 2010 ===================================== Anju Kumari, Wife of Mahesh Prasad, resident of VillageAmba, P.O.-Amba, P.S.-Alauli, District-Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna-1.

3. Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-1.

4. District Magistrate, Khagaria, District-Khagaria.

5. District Panchayat Raj Officer, Khagaria, DistrictKhagaria.

6. District Superintendent Education, Khagaria.

7. Sub-Divisional Education Extension Officer, Khagaria, District-Khagaria.

8. Block Education Extension Officer, Alauli, DistrictKhagaria.

9. Naresh Singh, the then Mukhia, Gram Panchayat RaJ, Amba Icharua, Block-Alauli, District-Khagaria.

10. Radhey Prasad Yadav, Panchayat Sachiv, Gram Panchayat Raj, Amba Icharua, Block-Alauli, DistrictKhagaria.

11. Chandra Kishore Singh, Incharge Headmaster, Middle School, Amba Panchayat Raj, Amba Icharua, Block-Alauli, District-Khagaria.

12. Sanju Kumari, Wife of Uday Chand Prasad Singh, r/o Village-Morkahi, P.O.-Amba, P.S.-Alauli Gram Panchayat Raj, Amba Icharua, District-Khagaria.

13. Pushlata Kumari, Wife of Rajeshwar Prasad Singh, r/o

Patna High Court C. REV. No.327 of 2014 (3) dt.23-09-2015 2/2 Village-Amba, P.S.-Alauli, Gram Panchayat, Amba Icharua, District-Khagaria.

14. Raju Ranjan, Son of Harilal Singh, r/o Village-Icharua, P.S.-Alauli, P.O.-Amba, District-Khagaria.

.... .... Respondent/s ===================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Verma, A.A.G.-5 ===================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-09-2015 I do not find that the petitioner has been able to make out a case for review of the order, dated 26.08.2014, passed in C.W.J.C. No.10905 of 2010, inasmuch as he has not been able to point out any error apparent on the face of the record or that certain some facts which could not be brought to the notice of this Court despite due diligence at the time of passing of the order, having bearing on the petitioner's case.

This application is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J.) Praveen-II/- U