Sukham Bhagat And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49130 of 2017 (2) dt.11-10-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49130 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -16 Year- 2017 Thana -RAGHUNATHPUR District- SIWAN ======================================================
1. Sukham Bhagat, S/o Late Ram Narayan Bhagat,
2. Ramesh Kushwaha @ Ramesh S/o Sukham Bhagat,
3. Umesh Kushwaha, S/o Sukham Bhagat, All R/o Villgae- Pipara, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan.
.... .... Petitioners/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 11-10-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioners was disposed of vide order dated 24.08.2017, with liberty to petitioners to renew their prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that now charge has been framed in this case and petitioners are in custody since 16.06.2017 and there is land dispute between the parties and petitioners are ready to abide by any condition imposed on him for grant of bail.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49130 of 2017 (2) dt.11-10-2017 the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge -III, Siwan, in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 16 of 2017, subject to the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioners will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make themselves available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T