Keshaw Lal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Urban Development Department

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2729 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3674 of 2017 ====================================================== Keshaw Lal Prasad, Son of Late Nem Narain Rai Resident of MohallaChakaram, Police Station- Budha Colony, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Urban Development Department Patna.

2.

Sri Anand Kishor, Addl. Chief Secretary, Urban Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

Dr. Chandra Shekhar Singh, District Magistrate, Son of name not known, Patna.

4.

Md. Makshud Alam, Sub Divisional Officer, Son of name not known Patna Sadar.

5.

Sri Jitendra Pandey, Circle Officer, Son of name not known Patna Sadar. 6.

Shri Animesh Kumar Parashar, Municipal Commissioner, Son of name not known Budh Marg, Patna.

7.

Shree Mithilesh Kumar Dinkar, Chief Engineer, Son of name not known Patna Water Board near Millar High School, Patna. 8.

Lal Babu Rai, Son of Late Khaira Rai Resident of Mohalla- Chakaram, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna- 800001.

9.

Smt. Gyanwati Devi, Wife of Sri Anil Yadav Resident of MohallaChakaram, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna and Ward Councilor of Ward No.- 24, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Suraj Narain Yadav- Advocate For the P.M.C.

:

Mr. Prasoon Sinha- Sr. Advocate For the State :

Mr. Additional Advocate General 7 AC to AAG-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AC to AAG-7 for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna Municipal Corporation.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court MJC No.2729 of 2024(6) dt.26-09-2025 2/2 the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed, as such, seeks permission to withdrawn the instant contempt application.

3. Accordingly, the instant contempt application is dismissed as withdrawn.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U