← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65998/2018bail granted

Manoj Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-19Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65998 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-190 Year-2016 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ======================================================

1. Manoj Yadav Son of Raghu Yadav

2. Nageshwar Yadav Son of Late Chamak Lal Yadav

3. Goutam Yadav Son of Late Anup Lal Yadav

4. Suresh Yadav Son of Late Dorki Yadav

5. Radhe Yadav Son of Late DomanYadav

6. Nirmal Yadav Son of Dharmendra Yadav

7. Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjeet Kumar Yadav Son of Jiyalal Yadav

8. Heeraman Yadav Son of Late Shivsahi Yadav

9. Began Pandit Son of Jagdeo Pandit

10. Manoj Yadav Son of Radhey Yadav

11. Bedanand Yadav Son of Indradeo Yadav

12. Dayali Yadav Son of Late Yogi Yadav Resident of Village-Mirhatti, P.S.- Sultanganj, Distt.-Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Davendra Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Saran Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No.190 of 2016 for allegedly having committed the offences under Sections 147, 149, 323, 341, 353, 379 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the main allegation against these petitioners is that they had entered into the office of the Circle Officer and disrupted him

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65998 of 2018(2) dt.19-12-2018 2/2 in discharge of his duties and also torn the cheque, which has been prepared for the beneficiaries of the flood reliefs. It is further submitted that the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedents and similarly situated co-accused Dilip Yadav has since been extended the privilege of anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No.61456 of 2018, vide order dated 20.11.2018.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let all the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1st, Bhagalpur, in connection with Sultanganj P.S. Case No.190 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T