← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19725/2021withdrawn

Sanjay Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-22Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19725 of 2021 ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Yadav Son of Sri Gorakh Yadav Resident of Village - Yogipur, Police Station- Gopalpur, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Gopalganj.

5.

The District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

6.

The District Program Offficer (Establishment), Gopalganj. 7.

The Block Development Officer, Gopalganj.

8.

The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Gopalganj. 9.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj, Kuchaikot, P.O. and P.S. Gopalganj. 10.

The Panchayat Secretary cum Member Secretary, Teachers Employment Unit, Bhopatpur Gram Panchayat, Kuchaikot, District- Gopalganj. 11.

Dharmendra Prasad Son of Mahajan Prasad Resident of Village - Bhibherwa, Police Station- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanat Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prabhakar Jha (Gp27) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-12-2023

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties concerned.

2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that against the order passed by the District Appellate Authority, Gopalganj, in Appeal Nos. 106, 108 and 110 of 2012, petitioner had moved before State Appellate Authority, in Appeal No. 381/2019 and the State Appellate Authority

Patna High Court CWJC No.19725 of 2021(3) dt.22-12-2023 2/2 has remanded the matter back before the District Appellate Authority, Gopalganj, for reconsideration.

3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that since at the time of filing the present writ application, the District Appellate Authority, Gopalganj, was not functioning, but, now, the District Appellate Authority, Gopalganj, has been constituted. Accordingly, he seeks permission to withdraw this application, with liberty to pursue the matter before the District Appellate Authority, Gopalganj.

4. Permission is granted.

5. This application is dismissed as withdrawn, with the liberty aforesaid.

(Anil Kumar Sinha, J.) Prabhakar Anand/- U √