Ramphal Das @ Rampat Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3663 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -179 Year- 2017 Thana -DUMRA District- SITAMARHI ======================================================
1. Ramphal Das @ Rampat Das, s/o late Charithar Das, resident of village - Methaura, Ward No. 7, P.S. Dumra, District - Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 25-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Dumra P.S. Case No.179 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 201/34 Indian Penal Code.
It has been submitted that petitioner in uncle-in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus allegation made against this petitioner. It has further been submitted that compromise petition has been filed in the Court below. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Dumra P.S. Case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3663 of 2018 (2) dt.25-01-2018 2/2 No.179 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T