Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57029/2025rejected

Rakesh Kumar Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-26Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57029 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-257 Year-2023 Thana- NAUHATTA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Rakesh Kumar Yadav @ Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Ranjan S/o Late Mahadeo Prasad Yadav R/o Village- Kasimpur, Ward No. 04, P.S.- Nauhatta, DistrictSaharsa (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashish Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pushpa Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 427, 504, 506, 34 and 354(A) of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner was rejected by this Court passed in Cr. Misc. No.42286 of 2024 and also again the prayer for bail of this petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn in Cr. Misc. No. 20155 of 2025.

4. As per allegation in the FIR, it is a case of shot fired by the petitioner due to which, the informant and his family members received severe injuries.

5. From perusal of the report of the learned Additional

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57029 of 2025(3) dt.26-09-2025 2/2 Sessions Judge-III, Saharsa vide order dated 09.09.2025, it appears that three chargesheet witnesses are yet to be examined and expected time to be concluded for trial within four months as submitted by the learned trial Court.

6. So considering the above report, there is no fresh ground to reconsider the prayer for bail of this petitioner.

7. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is again rejected.

8. The trial Court is directed to expedite the trial. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T