Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53967 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-963 Year-2018 Thana- PHULWARISHARIF District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Paswan, 2.

Ranjit Paswan, both son of Naresh Paswan @ Ram Naresh Paswan, resident of village - Janipur Nagwan, P.S.- Janipur (Phulwarisharif), Distt - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant, who has suo motu appeared.

2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Phulwarisharif (Janipur) PS Case No.963 of 2018 dated 24.11.2018 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The allegation against the petitioners is that they had opened fire on the informant and his family members resulting in injury and the reason disclosed is that the informant's niece was married to the petitioner no. 1 after being allegedly abducted about four years back and the accused were

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53967 of 2019 dt.27-11-2019 2/2 taunting the informant and his family members with regard to such incident.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that since the last four years the niece of the informant is living in their house as wife of the petitioner no. 1 and they have two children. It was submitted that no such incident occurred and the injury is simple in nature.

5. Learned APP and learned counsel for the informant submitted that there is direct and specific allegation of assault and the injury report corroborates the assault.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, the Court is not inclined to allow the prayer for pre-arrest bail to the petitioners.

7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) J. Alam/- AFR/NAFR U T