Suresh Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.65493 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2018 Thana- GAYA MUFASIL District- Gaya ======================================================
1. Suresh Yadav,
2. Sanjay Yadav @ Sanjay Kumar @ Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Both sons of Sitaram Yadav, Resident of Village- Murkatta, P.S.- Rampur, District- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Vasudeo Ram For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Shailendra Kumar -1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution case, in short, is that 1627 liters wine is recovered.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The names of the petitioners have transpired on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused namely Kiran Devi. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. It is alleged that
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65493 of 2018(2) dt.29-10-2018 2/2 1627 liters wine is recovered from the house of co-accused Kiran Devi. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 310/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T