Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29779/2016rejected

Ravi Roushan @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-11-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29779 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -113 Year- 2016 Thana -GANDHIMAIDAN District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Ravi Roushan @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar Son of Krishan Murari Prasad Ambashta, Resident of Mohalla- South Bajarangpuri,Shaheed Bhagat Singh Lane, P.S Alamganj, District- Patna .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyavrat Verma, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP 205 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 09-11-2016 Heard both sides.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 113 of 2016 under Section 307 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleged that he asked some questions from the teachers on such the petitioner took his person affront and asked the informant not to behave in such manner. On the next day when the informant came to class room, the petitioner assaulted him with knife on which the informant got blow on his hand and the second blow hit the teacher, Avinash, on his chest.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the teacher has given altogether a different story that some verbal altercation took place between the informant and the petitioner and the petitioner on the next day attacked the informant with pencil cutter and the teacher also got injury by the pencil cutter, but, from the perusal of the first information report and the case diary, it appears that some verbal altercation took place a day before and on the next day the petitioner made dagger blow on the informant and when the teacher came to pacify the teacher also got injury on chest. Considering the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on anticipatory bail and the same is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) SA/- U √ T √