Ravindra Sao v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57101 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2022 Thana- DHANGAI District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.

RAVINDRA SAO Son of Late Jhulan Sao R/V- Patluka, P.S- Dhangai, DistGaya 2.

Manju Devi Wife of Ravindra Sao R/V- Patluka, P.S- Dhangai, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .. ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shivendra Prasad,Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application submitting that petitioner no.1, has already been arrested during pendency of this application. Permission is granted.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn against petitioner no. 1.

Now, this application survives only for petitioner no. 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 504, 307, 379, 506, 447/34 of the IPC.

Allegedly, the accused persons named in F.I.R. including the petitioner assaulted the informant and his family. Petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant with lathi and danda. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57101 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 petitioner is quite innocent and have committed no offence. She has been falsely implicated in this case and the allegations as mentioned in the FIR are false and concocted. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. There is land dispute between the parties. Both the sides have received injuries. The informant side had suffered simple injuries. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since there is land dispute between the parties and injuries are simple in nature, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Dhangai P.S. Case No.04 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T