Patna High CourtCR. MISC./25207/2015bail granted

Chotoo Kumar @ Ravi Kumar @ Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-07Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25207 of 2015 (3) dt.07-10-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.25207 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHUA District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Chhotoo Kumar @ Ravi Kumar @ Suraj Kumar S/o Jawahar Bhagat Resident of Village Ram Math Fakuli, P.S. Kurdhani, District Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Paswan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. P.K.Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 07-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 I.P.C. and later on Sections 411 and 120 (B) I.P.C. have been added.

The first information report is against unknown. The petitioner has not been put on T.I. Parade. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of confessional statement of coaccused and he is in jail custody since 22.01.2015 but he has not been put on T.I. Parade. Similarly situated co-accused Randhir Kumar and Pankanj Kumar, who have confessed their guilt, have also been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 30816/2015 &

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25207 of 2015 (3) dt.07-10-2015 35133/2015.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No.36 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) V.P.Sinha/- U