Anil Kumar Vaidya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14848 of 2022 ====================================================== 1.
Anil Kumar Vaidya son of Gaya Datt Vaidya Resident of Village- Kaudiyari, Baluganj Brandi, Police Station- Deo, District- Aurangabad. 2.
Pramila Kumari wife of Manoj Kumar Singh, Lahiyarpur, Police StationNabinagar (Mali), District- Aurangabad. 3.
Dukhi Ram Son of Mabu Ram, Resident of Village- Raghunath Ganj, Police Station- Nabi Nagar, District- Aurangabad.
4.
Shirmati Devi wife of Nagina Ram, Resident of Village- Mahshu, Police Station - Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
5.
Vijay Prasad Son of Bhikshan Lal, Resident of Village-Manika, Police Station - Madanpur, District- Aurangabad.
6.
Indra Deo Yadav Son of Vishnu Yadav, Resident of Village- Chhoti Erki War Khas, Police Station - Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. 7.
Prabha Ranjan Devi wife of Rabindra Kumar Yadav, Resident of VillageGaiwal Bigha, Police Station - Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. 8.
Munni Devi @ Munni Kumari wife of Mithlesh Yadav, Resident of VillageGewal Bigha, Police Station - Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. 9.
Ram Pravesh Prasad Son of Nanhaku Prasad, Resident of Village -Chain, Police Station - Salaiya Madanpur, District- Aurangabad. .. ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar.
2.
The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna. 4.
The Director, Mass Education, Bihar, Patna.
5.
The District Education Officer, Aurangabad.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Kameshwar Kumar, GP-17 Mr.Arbind Kumar, AC to GP-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 27-02-2024
1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That this is an application for issuance of a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ(s) Order(s) Direction(S)
Patna High Court CWJC No.14848 of 2022(2) dt.27-02-2024 2/2 commanding and directing the respondentauthorities to adjust the petitioner in class III or Class IV post suitably as per their educational qualification as has been done in the matter of Supervisor and Instructors engaged in the Non Formal Education Scheme, sponsored by the Central Govt. and further the petitioner prays for a direction to grant the similar benefit to the petitioners in terms of class 4 (C) of the Bihar State Litigation policy 2011 and/ or for issuance of such other order or direction for which they may be found legally entitled to in the facts of circumstances of the case as stated in hereinafter."
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondentState submits that in view of the judgment rendered by the learned Division Bench of this Court in Civil Review No.59 of 2018, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that if that be the case, the present writ petition be disposed off.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) sonal/- U