Mohan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57096 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-339 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Mohan Yadav S/O Harkesh Yadav Resident of village- Rampur Madho, P.S.- Kuchaikot, Distt.- Gopalganj 2.

Dharmendra Yadav S/O Barma Yadav Resident of village- Balban Raymal, P.S.- Bishambharpur, Distt.- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dharmveer, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Gopalganj Excise P.S. Case No. 339 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, 90 litres country made liquor was recovered from the bush hut at gram Rampur Madho and it is alleged that the petitioners after seeing the police tried to fled away from the place of occurrence.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57096 of 2025(2) dt.21-08-2025 2/2 case on the basis of suspicion. Petitioners have no concern with the seized liquor. No incriminating articles have been recovered from possession of the petitioners. Petitioner no. 1 has two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail and petitioner no. 2 has one one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. Chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of absconding the petitioners and tampering with the evidences. Petitioners are in custody since 07.06.2025. They undertake to co-operate in the trial.

5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for grant of regular bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned concerned court below in Gopalganj Excise P.S. Case No. 339 of 2025.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T