Shahin Khanam v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18569 of 2014 ======================================================

1. Shahin Khanam wife of Sh. Khalid Ahmad, resident of 405-Imarat Apartment, New Patliputra Colony, Police Station- Patliputra, DistrictPatna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India, through the Secretary, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India, New Delhi

2. The Human Resource Development Department , Government of India, New Delhi.

3. The Member Secretary, Rehabilitation Council of India, B-22, Qutab Institution Area, New Delhi-16.

4. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna

5. The Director, Bihar Education Project-cum- Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Government of Bihar, Patna.

6. The State Programme Officer, Intrigrated Education, Bihar Education Project, Government of Bihar Patna.

7. The District Magistrate, Patna and all the District Magistrate of the State of Bihar.

8. The District Programme Officers -cum- Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Patna and all the District Programme Officers- cum- Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, of the State of Bihar.

9. The District Education Officer, Patna and all the District Education Officer of the State of Bihar.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: Mr. Ravinder Kumar Sharma, CGC For the Respondent No.5 : Mr. Girijesh Kumar For the Respondents-State : Mr. Anjani Kumar, AAG 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 09-11-2015 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. R.K.Sharma, learned CGC, appearing for the counsel for Union of India. Heard also Mr. Girijesh Kumar,

Patna High Court CWJC No.18569 of 2014 (5) dt.09-11-2015 learned counsel for the respondent No.5.

After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this PIL.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this PIL is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) A.I./- U