Dilip Prajapati v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57970 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2016 Thana- CHAND District- Bhabhua (Kaimur) ====================================================== Dilip Prajapati son of Ram Narayan Prajapati @ Ramayan Prajapati Resident of village and Police Station - Chand, District - Kaimur at Bhabua. ... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Garg For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. SRI AMITESH KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 12.04.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 55781 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 15.09.2016 and the trial has not been concluded. In near future it is not likely to be conclude. The wife of the petitioner died natural death and in the post mortem examination the cause of death has not been ascertained. The witnesses have stated that she died natural death. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that in FSL report Alluminium Phosphoid was detected which is highly poisonous substance and as such the prosecution version is corroborated that the deceased was killed by administering poison.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57970 of 2017(2) dt.06-12-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, at present, finding no good ground for reconsideration of the prayer of bail of the petitioner, again his such prayer stands rejected in S. Tr. No. 88 of 2017 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge I, Kaimur at Bhabhua.

However, learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, failing which the petitioner, if at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T