Ramjanm Chaudhary And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50763 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50763 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -281 Year- 2017 Thana -DHAKA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== 1.

Ramjanm Chaudhary, Son of Late Deeplal Choudhary 2.

Sunny Chaudhary, Son of Ramjanam Choudhary Resident of village - Yadopur Bakhri Khajuri, P.S. - Dhaka, District - East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioners/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-10-2017 The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 281 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30(A) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation is of recovery of 105 litres of Nepali Saufi liquor.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that he has falsely been implicated in this case and has no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he has sufficiently been punished for the said offence as he has been in judicial custody since 09.08.2017. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50763 of 2017 (2) dt.18-10-2017 recovery and period of custody and also that petitioners has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge cum Special Judge, Excise, Motihari, East Champaran, in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 281 of 2017.

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioners again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T