Firoz Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58060 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-357 Year-2024 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Firoz Alam, aged about 21 years, male, S/o Jumarati Miyan Resident of Village - Sawangiya, Ward No. 03, P.S.- Madhubani, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, AP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 27-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner is in custody in a case registered for the offence under Section 317(4), 317(5), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the allegation in the FIR, on 24.08.2024 the informant saw two motorcycle were coming form Khodadpur and signaled to stop. On search an instrument of breaking the lock was recovered. On interrogation, the accused persons along with the present petitioner disclosed that they were engaged in stealing the motorcycles and selling them to one, Abdulla.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that name of the petitioner has been implicated in this case merely, on the basis of suspicion as he was pillion rider of stolen motorcycle. He further submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58060 of 2025(2) dt.27-08-2025 2/2 during investigation, no cogent material against the petitioner has been collected by the police. He further submits that from perusal of the impugned order it appears that there is no progress of trial in the present case. He next submits that petitioner is in custody since 25.08.2024 and has got two criminal antecedents as stated in para-3 of the bail petition but fairly submits that he is on bail in both the cases.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for Regular bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No.357 of 2024 with a condition that petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date fixed by the learned Trial Court till conclusion of the trial. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Harshita/- U T