Dhrup Rai @ Dhruv Rai v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49018 of 2017 (2) dt.13-10-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49018 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2017 Thana -ISUAPUR District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Dhrup Rai @ Dhruv Rai, Son of Kamal Deo Rai, Resident of VillageLauwa, P.S.- Ishuapur, District- Saran at Chapra. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dewendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-10-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Ishuapur P.S.Case No.156 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30m 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Allegation against the petitioner is about recovery of 167 ltrs. of English wine from the field of Late Deonath Rai. The petitioner has been arrested on the spot.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has remained in custody for about 01 month.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49018 of 2017 (2) dt.13-10-2017 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 6th Additional District and Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra in connection with Ishuapur P.S.case No.156 of 2017.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled.

(iv) If his active participation is found in such type of cases in future, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T