Raju Alam @ Raju Suitor @ Raju Shutor @ Samasher Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57612 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1027 Year-2022 Thana- SIKARPUR District- West Champaran ====================================================== RAJU ALAM @ RAJU SUITOR @ RAJU SHUTOR @ SAMASHER ALAM SON OF MAINUDIN MIYA VILL- DHUMNAGAR GADIYANBI PS SHIKARPUR DISTRICT WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 09-11-2023
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sikarpur P.S. Case no.1027 of 2022 registered under sections 356, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, while the informant was returning with the bag containing money it is stated that three accused persons on another motorcycle snatched the bag of the informant containing Rs.1,03,000/- along with other documents as stated in the FIR. On hulla being raised the other persons gathered there. The informant states that he identified one accused to be the petitioner herein.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57612 of 2023(3) dt.09-11-2023 2/2 petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. Both of them belong to the same area. The dispute would be evident from the contents of the FIR at Annexure-2 lodged by the mother of the petitioner, though subsequent to the present FIR. The petitioner is in custody since 12.6.2023 and chargesheet has been submitted in the case.
5. Heard learned A.P.P. for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the nature of allegation against the petitioner in the FIR wherein the petitioner has been named by the informant, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail and the application is rejected.
7. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail on completing one year in custody or on framing of charge whichever is earlier.
(Partha Sarthy, J) Bibhash U T