Rinku Devi @ Rinki Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66426 of 2021 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14021 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-193 Year-2019 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan ====================================================== RINKU DEVI @ RINKI DEVI Daughter of Sheojee Singh Resident of Village Narhan, Police Station Raghunathpur District - Siwan at Present Wife of Jitendra Kumar Singh, Resident of Village Santhi, P.S. Raghunathpur, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Namrata Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of eight weeks.

The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 30.09.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14021 of 2020 by which the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 193 of 2019 to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. -VIII, Siwan and the petitioner was directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of twelve weeks.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66426 of 2021(2) dt.01-12-2021 2/3 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although the submission was made that the husband of the deceased was not in custody but in the order dated 30.09.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14021 of 2020, it had been mentioned in paragraph 8 of the order that the husband of the deceased is in custody.

From perusal of the record and the statement made in the present application, it appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is correct in her submission. The words "The husband of the deceased is in custody" typed in the eighth paragraph of the order dated 30.09.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14021 of 2020 be deleted.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to aforesaid reasons, the petitioner could not surrender in the Court below well within time. It is prayed on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner that further time may be extended so that the petitioner could surrender in the Court below.

Considering the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner and the grounds mentioned in the modification application, the period of surrender of the petitioner in the Court below is extended for a further period of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66426 of 2021(2) dt.01-12-2021 3/3 eight weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. The rest of the conditions stipulated in the order will be same.

The order dated 30.09.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14021 of 2020 is modified to the extent as indicated above. The modification application is, accordingly, allowed. (Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T