Narad Kumar @ Narad Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59608 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2023 Thana- SHEOHAR District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.

Narad Kumar @ Narad Paswan Son of Late Ramlal Paswan Resident of village- Rejma, P.S.-Sheohar, District- Sheohar 2.

Subhash Paswan Son of Late Ramlal Paswan Resident of village- Rejma, P.S.-Sheohar, District- Sheohar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate :

Ms. Rashmi Jha, Advocate :

Mr. Sagar Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-06-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

2. This is the 2nd attempt of the petitioner. Earlier the bail application of the petitioners were rejected vide order dated 10.01.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 83997 of 2023.

3. The petitioners seek regular bail in a case registered for the offence under Sections 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

4. The following order was passed on 10.01.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 83997 of 2023 :- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. This application for grant of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59608 of 2024(7) dt.27-06-2025 2/3 regular bail arises out of Sheohar P.S. Case No. 181 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The petitioners are alleged to have fired which hit the victim at four place.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that for a previous dispute the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case and they are in custody since 29.08.2023.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. In the occurrence, the informant, his daughter and one more person have been injured. The petitioner no.1 has six criminal antecedents and petitioner no.2 has three criminal antecedents.

7. Considering the seriousness of allegation levelled against the petitioners as well as the criminal antecedents of the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant the petitioners privilege of regular bail. Accordingly, this regular bail application is dismissed. The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial of all the cases pending against the petitioners and conclude the same as early as possible.

5. The petitioners are said to have fired which hit the victim.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have not committed any offence. The petitioners are in custody since 29.08.2023.

7. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

8. In the trial three witnesses have been examined, who have turned hostile.

9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59608 of 2024(7) dt.27-06-2025 3/3 case, this application for regular bail is allowed.

10. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheohar/concerned Court below in connection with Sheohar P.S. Case No. 181 of 2023.

11. As a condition of this order, the petitioners, after being released on bail are directed to co-operate in the trial either by appearing personally or through their lawyer in the trial Court on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Noncompliance of the condition will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioners.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) anand/- U T