Patna High CourtFA/34/2011dfd for non appearance

Ram Narayan Renu And ORS. v. Dr. Hari Narayan Prasad Singh

2026-01-05Mr. Justice Ramesh Chand Malviya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

FIRST APPEAL No.34 of 2011 ======================================================

1. Ram Narayan Renu, Son of Late Bhola Mahto.

2. Krishna Prasad Son of Late Bhola Mahto.

3. Jaynendra Kumar, Son of Late Bhola Mahto.

4. Rampari Devi, Daughter of Bhola Mahto.

5. Jitendra Narayan Sinha.

6. Bhagwati Charan.

7. Avinash Kumar.

Appellant nos. 5 to 7 are sons of Dr. Raghunandan Prasad

8. Indu Kumari.

9. Madhuri Kumari.

10. Kumari Kiran Prabha.

11. Supriya Sinha.

All Appellant no. 8 to 11, Daughter of Raghunandan Prasad.

12. Dr. Raghunandan Prasad, Son of Late Bhikhari Mahta. All residents of Village-Daha Bigha, P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda at present residing at J-55, peoples Co-operative Colony, Kankarbagh, Patna. ... ..Plaintiff/s . Appellant/s

Versus

1. Dr. Hari Narayan Prasad Singh Son of Late Chhotan Mahto, resident of Village-Shanti Bhawan Sathopur, P.S. Deep Nagar, District- Nalanda.

2. Ram Lakhan Prasad Singh, Son of Late Chhotan Mahto, resident of Navneet Colony, Hanuman Nagar, P.S. Hanuman Nagar, District- Patna.

3. Rajeev Prasad, Son of Late Diwakar Sharma @ Saryug Prasad.

4. Smt. Sharda Devi, Wife of Shobhi Mahto.

Resident of Village- Daha Bigha, P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda at present residing at D/46, P.C. Colony, Kankarbagh, P.S. Kankarbagh, District- Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

None For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER 05-01-2026 On several dates i.e., on 09.09.2025, 25.09.2025 and 20.11.2025, nobody appears on behalf of the learned counsel for the appellants.

2. On perusal of the records, it appears that this first appeal is of the year 2011 and the appellants are absented from

Patna High Court FA No.34 of 2011(34) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 several dates and even today on repeated calls, no one appears on behalf of the appellants, so in this circumstances, this first appeal is dismissed for default under Order 41 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

3. Nobody appears on behalf of learned counsel for the appellants. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Anand Kr.