← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12355/2023disposed

Rohan Raj v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-01Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12355 of 2023 ====================================================== Rohan Raj Son of Late Parmanand Yadav, Resident of village Saidpur, Ward Number 9, P.S. - Mansi, District Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Addl. Chief Secretary, the Department of Rural Development, Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Addl. Chief Secretary, the Department of Panchayati Raj, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The District Magistrate, Khagaria.

5.

The Additional District Magistrate, Khagaria. 6.

The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Khagaria.

7.

The Municipal Commissioner, Munger.

8.

Nagar Parishad, Khagaria.

9.

The Circle Officer, Manasi, Khagaria ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anand Vardhan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, S.C.-19 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-04-2024 Heard the parties.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following reliefs:- (i) for a direction to quashed/set aside the N.O.C dated 13/07/2023 passed by Circle Officer, Manasi and Revenue Officer, Manasi for construction of Waste Processing unit on the private land of abovementioned petitioner.

(ii) for a direction to the respondents to stay the construction of the Waste Processing unit on the private land of the petitioner till the disposal

Patna High Court CWJC No.12355 of 2023(3) dt.01-04-2024 2/2 of the case or acquisition of the private land of the petitioner and payment of compensation as per the law.

(iii) for a direction to respondents to acquire the said land petitioner according to the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 and pay adequate compensation to the petitioner.

3. There is nothing on record to show that the petitioner owns the land in question.

4. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be given liberty to produce all the documents before the concerned authority so that the appropriate decision can be taken in the matter.

5. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Neha/- U