Om Prakash Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13080 of 2024 ====================================================== Om Prakash Singh, son of Thakur Prasad Singh, Resident of village- Pakari Dih, P.O.- Pakari Mahmad, P.S.- Amnour, District - Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.

3.

Jai Prakash University, Chapra, through its Registrar. 4.

The Vice-Chancellor, Jai Prakash University, Chapra. 5.

The Registrar, Jai Prakash University, Chapra. 6.

B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur through its Registrar. 7.

The Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. 8.

The Vice-Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, Advocate Ms. Shifa Khan, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, AC to GP- 22 For the JP University :

Mr. Chandan Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-07-2025 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner came to be superannuated form the post of Associate Professor long back on 30.04.2019 from J. P. University, Chapra.

3. Mr. Shubh Narain Singh, learned Advocate for the petitioner, submits that for redrssal of the grievance, as prayed for in para.1 of the petition, the petitioner has already

Patna High Court CWJC No.13080 of 2024 dt.02-07-2025 2/2 filed representation, as contained in Annexure-P -/1/A, however, till date the same has not been considered and disposed of.

4. Advocate for the University referring to the order dated 26.07.2023, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 2755 of 2021, as contained in Annexure-P/6, has submitted that earlier the petitioner had come up before this Court and substantive payments under all heads have been paid.

5. Be that as it may, considering the fact that the petitioner has already filed a detailed representation for redressal of his grievance, let the same be taken to its logical conclusion within a period of twelve weeks from today.

6. Suffice it to observe that if there is still any admissible amount due in favour of the petitioner, the same shall be paid to him within the stipulated period.

7. The writ petition stands disposed of.

(Harish Kumar, J) uday/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 07.07.2025 Transmission Date NA