Ravi Ranjan Verma @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52566 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2019 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda ====================================================== RAVI RANJAN VERMA @ RAVI RANJAN KUMAR Son of Heera Lal Verma Resident of Mahapati Palace, Kamruddin Ganj Near Prabhat Khabar, Ranchi Road, P.S.-Laheri, District-Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar 2.

Supriya Verma D/o Rakesh Kumar Verma, W/o Ravi Ranjan Verma @ Ravi Ranjan Kumar Resident of Akbar Pur, P.O.-Raj Hat, P.S.-Akbarpur, DistrictNawada. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Tilak Sao, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Pronoti Singh, Addl Public Prosecutor Mr. SK Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341,342,323,307,498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

From perusal of Mediator's report dated 7.11.2019, it appears that mediation has failed.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this juncture, the petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- per month, starting from this month, to opposite

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52566 of 2019(3) dt.28-02-2020 2/3 party no. 2.

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3000/- per month, provisional bail dated 27.8.2019 is hereby confirmed on the following conditions:-

(1) Opposite party no. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the opposite party no. 2.

(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.

(4) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(5) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52566 of 2019(3) dt.28-02-2020 3/3

(6) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashi/- U T