Rani Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59502 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2024 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa ====================================================== Rani Kumari Daughter of Surendra Paswan R/O Vill.- Bhagwatpur, Ward no. 3, P.S.- Mahishi, Dist.- Saharsa.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-09-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a woman, and the informant alleges that petitioner had applied for employment on the post of Assistant Technical Manager based on her certificate of Graduation in Agriculture, her candidature was objected by another candidate, namely, Shewetanjali, accordingly an enquiry was conducted and it transpired that the petitioner had also secured a Diploma course during the period of her Graduation in Agriculture, hence she had obtained two certificates within the same period. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59502 of 2024(2) dt.17-09-2024 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is also submitted that it is not the case of the prosecution that petitioner had obtained fake certificate rather the informant alleges that petitioner had secured a Diploma certificate also while she was doing her Graduation in Agriculture. It is also submitted that petitioner never misused her Diploma certificate rather sought her appointment based on the certificate of Graduation in Agriculture which was required as per the advertisement. 5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 131 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T