Nesar Ansari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.58900 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -238 Year- 2016 Thana -RAMGARH District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== Nesar Ansari, son of Gulbas Ansari, Resident of village- Deohaliya, P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Nandan Sahay, Advocate. For the informant : Mr. RajeevRanjan Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nawal Kishore Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. Prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 12.05.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. 14674 of 2017 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months. It has been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 18.2.2017.
A report has been called for from the court below which has been received. From the report it appears that after framing of charge, only one witness has partly been examined. Therefore, keeping in view that the case is under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and petitioner has already remained in custody since 18.2.2017 and not even a single witness has been completely examined in the court bellow, prayer for bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.58900 of 2017 (3) dt.24-01-2018 2/2 of the petitioner is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned IVth Additional Sessions Judge, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 255 of 2017/192 of 2017 arising out of Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 238 of 2016 subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner.
The petitioner in any manner will not try to hamper the trial by intimidating or influencing the witnesses and will remain present on each and every date of trial. Any two subsequent defaults will result in cancellation of bail bonds in the court below.
(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T