Bilash Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55930 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -47 Year- 2015 Thana -TRIVENIGANJ District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Bilash Kumar Yadav, Son of Maheswari Yadav, Resident of villageSahegadh, P.S. and District- Madhepura .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Durgesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with S. T. No. 106 of 2015 arising out of Triveniganj, P.S. Case No. 47 of 2015 registered under Sections 354B, 366, 504 and 323 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is contended that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has got no criminal antecedent and is languishing in custody since 27.02.2015. Learned counsel for the state has contested the matter. She has submitted that it is a gross case in which a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55930 of 2015 (2) dt.14-12-2015 2 / 2 school teacher was intercepted while she was on way to her school and the petitioner, who is a grown up man having three children, forcibly tried to abduct her. She has further contended that charges have already been framed on 16th July 2015 and the prosecution would examine all its witnesses within the shortest possible time.

Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner for the present. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. The learned A.D.J. II, Supaul is directed to hold the trial on day-to-day basis and conclude the same as early as possible. The prosecution is also directed to produce all its witnesses within six months from today, failing which the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the Court below itself.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Sanjeet/- U T