← Library
Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1504/2023disposed

Gautam Agrawal v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Gov. Of Bihar, Patna

2025-03-24Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1504 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Patna ====================================================== Gautam Agrawal Son Of Gobind Lal Agrawal 404 Sheela Residency East Boring Canal Road P.S. Buddha Colony , Dist.- Patna 800001. Presently Partner In M/S Maa Bhagwati Power System, Registered Office 601, Hari Niwas Complex, Dakbanglow Road, P.S- Kotwali, Dist.- Patna 800001. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Gov. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Patna Bihar 3.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Distt. - Patna Bihar 4.

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Kotwali Bihar 5.

The SHO, Kotwali Police Station, Distt. - Patna Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Giri, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. M. Nasrul Huda Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER 24-03-2025 It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that after institution of the instant writ petition, police has already registered F.I.R. and the investigation of this case is going on. Therefore, the first prayer of the petitioner being satisfied, no order is required to be passed in this regard.

2. It is also submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioner that police authority may be directed to investigate the case properly. I am afraid, a writ court cannot pass any such directions because it is the domain of the learned Magistrate to make necessary order if the investigation is found to be

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1504 of 2023(3) dt.24-03-2025 2/2 perfunctory or not properly conducted, as the second prayer of the petitioner cannot be entertained by the writ court, the said prayer is rejected.

3. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is thus, disposed of.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J) mdrashid/- U T