Prince Kumar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56414 of 2015 (2) dt.22-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.56414 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -375 Year- 2015 Thana -LAHERIASARAI District- DARBHANGA ====================================================== PRINCE KUMAR SAHNI, SON OF BIJYA KUMAR SAHNI, RESIDENT OF MOHALLA- WAKARGANJ ABHANDA, POLICE STATIONLAHERIASARAI AND DISTRICT- DARBHANGA. .... .... PETITIONER/S
VERSUS
THE STATE OF BIHAR .... .... OPPOSITE PARTY/S ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 22-12-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner is accused in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 375 of 2015 registered under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. rather in course of investigation petitioner and co-accused, Amit Kumar Yadav, were apprehended by the police showing the recovery of stolen motorcycle while the said motorcycle was not found in possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that similarly situated co-accused, Amit Kumar Yadav, has
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56414 of 2015 (2) dt.22-12-2015 already been granted privilege of bail by a Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.11.2015 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 47608 of 2015.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga, in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 375 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T