Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56568/2015bail granted

Pramod Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56568 of 2015 (4) dt.26-02-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.56568 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -190 Year- 2013 Thana -KHAIRA District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Pramod Yadav son of Suresh Yadav, Resident of village- Kodwaria, P.S.- Chandradip, District- Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ambika Bhagat For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Nr. Singh1 (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 190 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 363, 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is submitted that the name of the petitioner has come in the confessional statement of co-accused Ratan Chaudhary, the victim after his release has not stated the name of the petitioner vide para 22 of the case diary and without any legal and tangible material the petitioner is suffering in custody since 24.09.2015. Co- accused Sheo Shankar has been allowed bail vide Criminal Misc.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.56568 of 2015 (4) dt.26-02-2016 No.24090 of 2014. The learned A.P.P. submits that the petitioner has also confessed his guilt.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the period of detention of the petitioner now he is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned C.J.M., Jamui, in connection with Khaira P.S. Case No. 190 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) siddharth/- U T