Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57682/2017bail granted

Nitish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-03-14Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57682 of 2017 (3) dt.14-03-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.57682 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -114 Year- 2017 Thana -CHANDI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Nitish Kumar S/o Late Ragho Prasad, R/o Village- Budhaul, P.S.- Noorsarai, District- Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Nand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 14-03-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner, who is in custody since 21.04.2017, has renewed his prayer for bail in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 114 of 2017 for the offences alleged under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code having earlier been rejected by this Court by order dated 13.07.2017 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 31930 of 2017.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with opening of bank account on the basis of forged Aadhar card and PAN card. The petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Be that as it may, having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the period of custody already suffered since 21.04.2017 let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Sikandar Paswan, learned J,.M. Ist Class, Hilsa,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.57682 of 2017 (3) dt.14-03-2018 Nalanda in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No. 114 of 2017 on the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(iii) That the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(iv) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned. (Vikash Jain, J) Chandran/BT U T