Upendra Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19815 of 2014 ====================================================== Upendra Singh, S/o Late Shiv Narayan Singh, Resident of Village- Kanha Bahuara, P.O. Gorari, P.S. Karakat, District Rohtas at Sasaram. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Co-operative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Co-operative Registrar Hukum Singh Meena, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Sandeep Kr. R. Wood Kalkutty, Rohtas, Sasaram.
4. The District Co-operative Officer, Nikesh Kr., Rohtas, Sasaram.
5. The Block Co-operative Officer, Arun Kr. Lal, Rohtas, Sasaram.
6. The Chairman, Primary Agriculture Co-operative Society, Ajay Kumar Singh S/o Harihar Singh Prakhand Karakat, Camp-Gurari, District Rohtas.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Smt. Namrata Mishra, G.A.-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE And HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 15-12-2015 Heard Mr. Uday Narayan Singh, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, and Mrs. Namarata Mishra, learned Government Advocate No.13, appearing for the respondents. After some arguments, Mr. Uday Narayan Singh, learned Counsel, appearing for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach the appropriate authority with appropriate application, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19815 of 2014 (3) dt.15-12-2015 2/2 No objection has been raised by the respondents to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner. In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this writ application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or to take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible. (I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Sunil/- U