Wiman Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57297 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2025 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Wiman Sah, S/O Vinod Sah, R/o village- Harivan, Ward No.11, P.S.- Harivan, District- Sarlahi, Nepal ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-12-2025 Heard Mr. Krishna Murari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 8, 20(b)(ii)(B) of the N.D.P.S. Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, 4.5 Kg of ganja was recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from his possession. The witnesses of the seizure list are police personnel. It has also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57297 of 2025(4) dt.10-12-2025 2/2 been submitted that the police has not complied Section 105 of the B.N.S.S. It has also been submitted that the contraband which has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner is though more than small quantity but is much less than commercial quantity. Petitioner is having no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 16.06.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (NDPS Act), Sitamarhi in connection with Sonbarsa P.S. Case No. 181 of 2025. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T