Patna High CourtCR. WJC/1241/2014dismissed

Vidhya Sagar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-01-05Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1241 of 2014 (2) dt.05-01-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1241 of 2014 ====================================================== Vidhya Sagar son of Ram Ayodhya Rai, resident of village-Basudeopur Sarai, P.S.-Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.The State of Bihar 2.The Principal Secretary Home (Police) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna 4.The Deputy General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna 5.The Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur 6.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur 7.The Officer-in-charge Sahebganj Police Station, Muzaffarpur 8.Braj Kishore Singh son of Late Nand Lal Singh, Sahebganj Police Station, Muzaffarpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. N.K.Singh, S.C.-II ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-01-2015 The defect as pointed out by the office is ignored. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner has been made accused in Sahebganj P.S. Case No.185 of 2014 dated 23rd June, 2014 which was initially registered for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code but in course of investigation section 302 of the Indian Penal Code has also been added in the FIR.

A bare perusal of the FIR makes it clear that the

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.1241 of 2014 (2) dt.05-01-2015 allegation made in the written report submitted by the informant on the basis of which formal FIR was drawn do constitute a cognizable offence.

In that view of the matter, I find no merit in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Md.S./- U T