Deepak Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66502 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Son Of Shankar Singh Resident Of Village- Ward No 10, Kashipur, Kashipur Chak Bibi, Bidupur Vaishali, Hajipur , Rajapakar Baranti, O.P, Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Virendra Kumar Ray, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State and perused the case diary. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner assaulted upon the head of the informant by means of sword.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioner has been made accused merely on suspicion and dirty village politics. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66502 of 2021(3) dt.04-08-2022 2/2 anticipatory bail and submitted that there is direct allegation against this petitioner that he assaulted the informant by means of sword on the head of the informant and injury report shows that he sustained two incised wounds on vital part of the body and there is one redness of left eye and swelling After considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that there is specific allegation against this petitioner of assault upon the informant, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail and the court below may consider his regular bail without being prejudiced by this order.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T