← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./72074/2018bail granted

Avinash Kumar @ Kuchha v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-04Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.72074 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-404 Year-2018 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Avinash Kumar @ Kuchha Son of Maharundra Mishra resident of VillageMahmadpur Shiv ram (wrongly mentioned as Dharmagatpur) P.S.- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Hari Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 272, 273, 353 and 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 27 of the Arms Act and 30(a), 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 3868.2 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accuseds namely Pankaj Kumar,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.72074 of 2018(2) dt.04-12-2018 2/2 Suraj Kumar Ram and Ravi Kumar. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. It is alleged that 3868.2 liters wine is recovered from nine different vehicles. None of the vehicles in question belongs to the petitioner. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sakra P.S. Case No. 404/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T